Booze, Ballots, and Broken Dreams: Don’s Party and its Cinematic Representations of the 1969 Federal Election

Jo Coghlan

Bruce Beresford’s seminal film Don’s Party (1976), adapted from David Williamson’s sharp-edged play, is an incisive representation of suburban Australian identity, political aspiration, and social disillusionment. Set in the context of the 1969 federal election, the film serves as a powerful cultural artefact, encapsulating a specific moment when Australians, weary after two decades of conservative governance under the Liberal Party (since 1949), held genuine hopes for a progressive transformation under a Labor government. The narrative explores how this night of political promise swiftly descends into bitter disillusionment, emblematic of broader socio-political tensions simmering beneath the surface of Australian suburban life.

The year 1969 marked a critical juncture in Australia’s social and political history. Progressive movements—fuelled by opposition to the Vietnam War, rising feminism, civil rights advocacy, and a growing demand for Indigenous land rights—coalesced around a vision for a fairer, more inclusive nation. Throughout the 1960s, the image of Australia as a socially conservative, politically complacent nation was vigorously contested by activism from multiple quarters. Anti-Vietnam War protests, such as the mass moratorium marches, indicated deep divisions within Australian society over foreign policy and the ethics of military conscription. Simultaneously, the feminist movement became increasingly influential, calling attention to structural inequalities faced by Australian women in employment, reproductive rights, and family law. Meanwhile, the 1967 referendum, which recognised Aboriginal Australians in the national census, symbolised a growing acknowledgement of Australia’s need to reconcile its colonial legacy. All of these movements fed into a broader expectation that social and political progress would be mirrored at the ballot box.

Don’s Party deftly captures the heightened expectations associated with this wave of social consciousness. On election night, a gathering of suburban friends congregates at the home of Don Henderson, reflecting the prevailing sentiment that a Labor victory was both imminent and symbolic of a broader societal transformation. The film's strength lies in its nuanced depiction of this suburban cohort—progressive intellectuals, teachers, civil servants, and housewives—who have absorbed these revolutionary ideals into their everyday identities, aspirations, and self-perceptions. Yet, as the evening progresses, the results shatter their collective optimism. Rather than witnessing a moment of national renewal, the characters confront the sobering reality of continued conservative dominance, ultimately prompting self-reflection, recriminations, and personal conflict.

The film’s power in articulating national narratives resides in its masterful blending of public political disenchantment with intimate, private disillusionment. Williamson’s script highlights the complexities of Australian identity: progressive-minded individuals striving to reconcile their ideals with the realities of suburban life, domestic expectations, marital tensions, gendered anxieties, and career disappointments. Characters grapple not only with a political system resistant to reform but also with their own complicity in the status quo, embodied by suburban materialism, entrenched gender roles, and disillusionment with professional ambition and personal fulfilment.

These elements of suburban aspiration and disillusionment position Don’s Party as a particularly Australian narrative—at once distinct in its suburban locale and universal in its reflection of middle-class anxieties. Suburbia, as Beresford portrays it, is the crucible of both national ambition and individual compromise. This setting reflects the inherent contradictions within Australian society at this pivotal moment: an outwardly prosperous nation, enjoying post-war economic growth, yet internally dissatisfied, yearning for a cultural and political evolution continually delayed by conservative dominance.

Furthermore, the film is an important cultural lens through which scholars and commentators have examined Australia’s struggles with its own progressive impulses and entrenched conservatism. The dissonance between social movements’ aspirations and the political reality of entrenched Liberal Party rule, symbolised by Prime Ministers such as Robert Menzies, Harold Holt, and John Gorton, is central to understanding the broader narrative of Australian history. The Liberal Party's continuous rule since 1949 until the election of Gough Whitlam in 1972 is perceived as both a stabilising and stifling influence, shaping Australia’s cautious attitudes towards cultural change, policy innovation, and social reform.

Don’s Party thus becomes more than simply a filmic exploration of personal disenchantment; it is also a richly layered reflection on Australia's complicated relationship with social progress and political conservatism. Its capacity to evoke broader national stories—about dashed political hopes, suburban realities, cultural anxieties, and the often uncomfortable reconciliation between public aspirations and private frustrations—establishes it as a vital cultural artefact. Through the microcosm of one suburban household, the film captures a nation struggling with its identity, questioning its social foundations, and navigating the persistent tension between stability and change.

As a significant historical and cultural document, Don’s Party continues to resonate beyond its original 1970s audience, retaining scholarly attention due to its insights into the emotional and ideological lives of Australians caught between progressive ideals and conservative realities. Its ability to simultaneously entertain, critique, and enlighten positions the film as an enduring commentary on the contradictions of Australian society—illuminating both the vibrancy of progressive movements and the recurrent disappointments experienced by those who long for meaningful social and political change.

References

Arrow, Michelle. Friday on Our Minds: Popular Culture in Australia Since 1945. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2009.

Beresford, Bruce, dir. Don’s Party. 1976; Sydney: Phillip Adams Productions, DVD.

Bolton, Geoffrey. The Oxford History of Australia, Volume 5: 1942–1988: The Middle Way. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Bongiorno, Frank. The Eighties: The Decade that Transformed Australia. Melbourne: Black Inc., 2015.

Curran, James, and Stuart Ward. The Unknown Nation: Australia After Empire. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2010.

Gerster, Robin, and Jan Bassett. Seizures of Youth: The Sixties and Australia. Melbourne: Hyland House, 1991.

Horne, Donald. Time of Hope: Australia 1966–72. Sydney: Angus & Robertson, 1980.

Lake, Marilyn. Getting Equal: The History of Australian Feminism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1999.

Langley, Greg. A Decade of Dissent: Vietnam and the Conflict on the Australian Homefront. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1992.

Macintyre, Stuart. A Concise History of Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

McFarlane, Brian, Geoff Mayer, and Ina Bertrand, eds. The Oxford Companion to Australian Film. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Murphy, John. Harvest of Fear: A History of Australia's Vietnam War. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1993.

Scalmer, Sean. Dissent Events: Protest, the Media, and the Political Gimmick in Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2002.

Williamson, David. Don’s Party. Sydney: Currency Press, 1971.